Debt becomes their

I read this article “Goodbye, American dream”on Financial Times, July31/August 1, 2010. This is a dreadful story, two families, middle class workers, steady income, but the living is still harsh for them, compared with their father’s. Their financial situation is very tied. They cannot afford any luxury or sickness. And they do not have any social benefit, just like those in Canada and Europe. It seems the American dream has disappeared.

Why this happens? Where should we impute? Who should we blame? All the rightwing politicians?All the unions? The Globalization? The treacherous banks? Or the foolish self?

As I have some friends living in USA, they are not as bad as those two families. And I do not believe that those friends of mine belong to the top 10% of people there. The major difference between my friends and the two families in this article is that my friends have much less debt than they have.

The crisis in the USA now is not caused by the other things, but the people heavily believe in debt. Every spending is built on credit. Although the interest is affordable, but the payable will be kept on increasing. Until it reachs a point where the receivable cannot match. The tied balance will create many problems if the asset value becomes diminished.

Of course, when the property price is booming, it is America dream. The mortgage bank can call their customer four times each night for loan offering. They called it predatory lending. When the property price is busted, that’s goodbye! The property will be foreclosure.

It seems to me that the way the US government measure the economic revival is not by the money growth, but the amount of loan offered by the banks. Certainly, US government wants their people to borrow more and more because the government does not want their people's money to make money. They want only they can make money. So, suppress the interest as low as possible.

It should be quite clear right now, the debt cannot create American dream. How many people in States know that? The top 10%? Or the bottom 90%? Hopefully at least, they should begin to understand that to decrease the debt is the only way to cure the nightmare.

所有評論

葉落梧桐 - 2010年08月02日 05:11

It sounds like a pocket money lesson in a kindergarten, a Chinklish peasants' kindergarten!

葉落梧桐 - 2010年08月02日 05:36

Really ? ! Is there any need to parrotting awkwardly, in Chinklish, what we have already been told times and times again by better informed professionals.

陶尚 - 2010年08月02日 07:39

Can they change their living patterns?

只有登入後或登記成為會員才能發表意見

版規:

  1. 網站編輯或網站作家開題,網友可回應。回應必須貼題,請勿重覆;勿發表誹謗,人身攻擊或不雅內容。
  2. 網站編輯有權發表或不發表網友張貼的內容。(請參閱議論守則)
  3. 開題之網友可編輯其在過去7天內發表之論題,或刪除相關回應。

查閱 FAQ

信報簡介 | 服務條款 | 私隱條款 | 免責聲明 | 廣告查詢 | 信報會議中心租賃 | 加入信報 | 聯絡信報

股票及指數資料由財經智珠網有限公司提供。期貨指數資料由天滙財經有限公司提供。外滙及黃金報價由路透社提供。

本網站的內容概不構成任何投資意見,本網站內容亦並非就任何個別投資者的特定投資目標、財務狀況及個別需要而編製。投資者不應只按本網站內容進行投資。在作出任何投資決定前,投資者應考慮產品的特點、其本身的投資目標、可承受的風險程度及其他因素,並適當地尋求獨立的財務及專業意見。本網站及其資訊供應商竭力提供準確而可靠的資料,但並不保證資料絕對無誤,資料如有錯漏而令閣下蒙受損失,本公司概不負責。